Investigating the Conceptual Understanding of Physics through an Interactive-Lecture Engagement

Aina Jacob KOLA


Thirty-two pre-service physics teachers were sampled for the study to investigate the effect of interactive lecture engagement on the conceptual understanding of physics students. Pre-test- post-test quasi-experimental design was adopted for the study. Physics Achievement Test (PAT); Interactive Student’s Questionnaire (ISQ), and Focus Group Interviews (FGI) were used as the research instruments. Data collected were analyzed using a mixed between subjects ANOVA and t-test as statistical tools. Two research questions were raised to guide the study. Findings revealed that there was a significant interaction between the students’ scores in the conceptual physics and the teaching method employed. Besides, through the interactive engagement, the students were able to identify some misconceptions in conceptual physics. There was no significant gender difference in performance among the students in the interactive engagement. The study has some implications for stakeholders in education.

Full Text:

Full Text


Adeyemo, S. A. (2010). Teaching /learning of physics in Nigerian secondary schools : The curriculum transformation, issues, problems, and prospects. International Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), 99–111.

Agommuoh, P.C., &Ifeanacho, A.O. (2013). Secondary school students’ assessment of

innovative teaching strategies in enhancing achievement in physics and mathematics. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 3(5), 6-11

Aina, J.K. &Akintunde, Z.T. (2013). Analysis of gender performance in physics in colleges

of education, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(6), 1-5.

Aina, J.K., &Langenhoven, R. (2015). Teaching method in science education: the need for

a paradigm shift to peer instruction (PI) in Nigerian schools. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(6), 6-15.

Alao, A.A &Abubakar, R.B (2010). Gender and academic performance of college physics

students: A case study of the department of physics/ computer science education, Federal College of Education (Technical) Omoku, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 1(1), 129-137.

Barry, J. (n.d). Data analysis of pre-post study designs. Cornell statistical consulting unit

Retrieved from

Baser, M. (2006). Effects of Conceptual Change and Traditional Confirmatory Simulations

on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Direct Current Circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 267-381. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-006-9025-3.

Beaumont, R. (2009). Research methods and experimental design: a set of notes suitable for

seminar use. Introduction to Health Informatics Research Methods. Retrieved from C:web_sites_mineHIcourseweb newchap16s1SEMBK2.docx.

Bernhard, J., Lindwall, O., Engkvist, J., & Zhu, X. (2007). Making physics visible and learnable through interactive lecture demonstrations. Physics Teaching in Engineering Education PTEE. Retrievedfrom

Best, J.W., & Kahn, J.V. (1989). Research in education (6thed.). India: Prentice-Hall.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007).Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge

Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results

American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977

Crouch, C.H, Watkins, J., Fagen, A.P. & Mazur, C. (2007). Peer Instruction: Engaging

students one-on-one, all at once. Research-Based Reform of University Physics. Retrieved from

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(2011), 862–864.

Dimitrov D.M. &Rumrill, P.D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change.

Speaking of Research. Retrieved from

Duschl, R., &Gitomer, D. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change:

Implications for educational practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 839–858.

Eraikhuemen, L., &Ogumogu, A .E. (2104).An assessment of secondary school physics

teachers conceptual understanding of force and motion in Edo South senatorial district. Academic Research International, 5(1), 253-262.

Erinosho, S.Y. (2013). How do students perceive the difficulty of physics in secondary

school? An exploratory study in Nigeria. International Journal of Cross-disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE) Special Issue, 3(3), 1510-1515.

Fagen, A.P.,& Mazur, E. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the introductory science courses

in physics and biology: Peer Instruction, classroom demonstration, and genetic

vocabulary. (Doctoral dissertation) Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Retrieved from

Franklin, S.V., Sayre, E.C., Clark, J.W. (2014). Traditionally taught students learn: actively

Engaged students remember. American Journal of Physics, 82(8), 798-801. doi:10.1119/1.4890508

Garbett, D. (2011). Constructivism deconstructed in science teacher education. Australian

Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 36-49. =

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. and. Chadwick, B. (2008).Methods of data collection

in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. DOI: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.

Gok, T. (2013). A comparison of students’ performance, skill and confidence with peer

instruction and formal education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(6), 747-758

Gok, T. (2014). Peer instruction in the physics classroom: effects on gender difference

performance, conceptual learning, and problem-solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 776-788

Gooding, J., & Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change: tips for identifying and overcoming students' misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 34-37.

Green, P. J. (2003). Peer instruction for astronomy. Prentice Hall series in educational innovation. Harvard: Prentice- Hall. Retrieved from

Hatim, A.H. (2001). Toward more objective teaching. Iraqi Journal of Medical Science.

(2), 99-101.

Herrington, J.A. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments.

(Doctoral dissertation) Edith Cowan University, Australia. Retrieved from

Herrington, J., & Kelvin, L. (2007). Authentic learning supported by technology: 10

suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. Educational Media International, 44(3), 219-236.

Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C. & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-learning. New York:


Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.,andTjosvold, D. (2000). Constructive Controversy: The

value of Intellectual Opposition.In M. Deutsch and P. T. Coleman, eds., The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (pp. 65-85), San Francisco: Jossey-Bas Publishers.

.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2007).Creative controversy: Intellectual challenge in the

Classroom (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction.

Johnson, R.B., & Christensen, L.B. (2007). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative

and mixed approaches. NY: Sage Publication

Koudelkova, V., Dvorak, L. (2014). High school students´ misconceptions in electricity and

magnetism and some experiments that can help students to reduce them. Retrieved October 6, 2016, from

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T.J. (2011). A guide for novice researchers on experimental and quasi-

experimental studies in information systems research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 6(2011), 152-160.

Liang, S. (2016). Teaching the concept of limit by using conceptual conflict strategy and

Desmos graphing calculator. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 35-48.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: a user’s manual. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

McCarthy, J. P.,& Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 279–294.

Mekonnen, S. (2014) Problems challenging the academic performance of physics students

in higher governmental institutions in the case of Arbaminch, WolayitaSodo, Hawassa and Dilla Universities. Natural Science, 6,362-375.

Ogunniyi, M. B (1992). Understanding research in the social sciences. Ibadan: The

University Press

Oladejo, M.A, Olosunde, G.R, Ojebisi, A.O., & Isola, O.M. (2011). Instructional materials

and students’ academic achievement in physics: some policy implications. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 2220-9425.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS

(4thed.). Australia: Allen &Unwin.

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler R. S., &Alibali, M.W. (2001). Developing conceptual

understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362. DOI. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346.

Rodrigues, A., & Oliveira, M. (2008).The role of critical thinking in physics learning. Retrieved from

Sandler, P.M., &Sonnert, G. (2016). Understanding misconception: teaching and learning

in middle school physical science. American Educator. Retrieved from

Savinainen, A., Scott, P., &Viiri, J. (2004). Using a bridging representation and social

interactions to foster conceptual change: Designing and evaluating an instructional sequence for Newton’s third law. Science Education 89(2): 175–195.

Shamim, M, Rashid, T, &Rashid, R. (2013). Students’ academic performance in physics

correlates the experience of teachers in higher secondary schools of Jammu and Kashmir state. International Journal of Current Research, 5(1), 201-204.

Sheriff, M. A. Maina, B. T. and Umar, Y. (2011). Physics in education and human resources

development. Continental Journal of Education Research, 4(3), 23-36.

Stein, M., Larrabee, T.G., & Barman, C.R. (2008). A study of common beliefs and

misconceptions in physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 1-11

Stephen, U.S (2010).Technological attitude and academic achievement of physics

students in secondary schools. African Research Review, 4(3a), 150-157

Thompson, F., & Longue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in

Science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553-559.

Tsai, C. C. (2003). Using a conflict map as an instructional tool to change student alternative

conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education 25(3): 307–327.

Venville, G.J., Dawson, V.M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10

students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977.

Windschitl, M., and Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual

change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(2), 145–160.

Wyrembeck, E. P. (2005). Using a force plate to correct student misconceptions.Physics

Teacher 43(6), 384–387.

Venville, G.J., Dawson, V.M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10

students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977.

Viennot, L. (n.d). Learning and conceptual understanding: beyond simplistic ideas, what

have we learned? Retrieved from

Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50(1), 47-54

Wanbugu, P.W., Changeiywo, J.M.,&Ndiritu, F.G. (2013). Investigations of experimental

cooperative Concept mapping instructional approach on secondary school girls’ achievement in physics in Nyeri County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice,4(6), 120-130.

Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013).Retaining students in science, technology, engineering,

and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36-40.

Wood, L.N., Joyce, S., Petocz, P. & Rodd, M. (2007). Learning in lectures: multiple

Representations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 907–915.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

e-ISSN: 2147-1606

Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education